Criminal Law 2023 BAR QUESTIONS
1. Catalina,
a Spanish national, and Conrado, a Filipino, set up a counterfeiting factory in
Shenzhen, China. Their factory produces fake United States (US) Dollars,
Japanese Yen, and Philippine Pesos, which are distributed only in Europe and
the US. While vacationing in Panglao, Bohol, they were arrested by a special
task force of the National Bureau of Investigation on the strength of a warrant
of arrest issued by a Philippine court for Counterfeiting and Forgery. Both
Catalina and Conrado claimed that the Philippine court does not have
jurisdiction over them since they did not commit any criminal act within the
territory of the Philippines. Catalina also argued that the Philippine court
does not have jurisdiction over her person as she is a Spanish citizen. Are Catalina and Conrado correct? Discuss.
2. When
Joey came home from work, he saw a man and a woman making love in the main
bedroom. Enraged at the thought that his wife, Abby, was unfaithful to him, he
shot the man and woman to death. However, the couple turned out to be the
driver and kasambahay. The families
of the decedents filed a case of double Homicide against Joey. Joey invoked the
defense of mistake of fact, arguing that he thought the persons he shot were
his wife and her lover. Thus, he is entitled to the privilege or benefit of
Article 247 of the Revised Penal Code, which entitles a legally married person,
who having surprised his or her spouse in the act of sexual intercourse, kills
or seriously injures the same, to the penalty of destierro for being an exceptional circumstance. Is Joey correct in invoking the defense of
mistake of fact? Discuss.
3. Domeng,
in conspiracy with Dado and Dario, kidnapped and detained 9-year-old Rosanna.
They demanded ₱2 million as ransom money from the family of Rosanna in exchange
for her life and liberty, which the family agreed to pay. However, Domeng,
Dado, and Dario killed Rosanna while she was in captivity. What crime, if any, did Domeng, Dado, and Dario commit? Discuss your
answer.
4. During
a concert at nighttime held in the Cultural Center of the Philippines, Chito
physically assaulted another attendee, Butch. Chito slapped Butch several times
in front of the President of the Philippines, who was also present. Are there any modifying circumstances
affecting the criminal liability of Chito? Explain your answer.
5. Mark
was charged with Rape as a principal by direct participation while his
employer, Ado, was charged as a principal by inducement for forcing Mark to
commit rape by holding him at gunpoint. Mark was acquitted by the trial court
for having acted under the compulsion of an irresistible force. Meanwhile, Ado
was convicted of Rape. Ado appealed on the ground that he cannot be held liable
because there can be no crime if there is no principal by direct participation.
Is the argument of Ado tenable? Explain.
6. Pido,
a private contractor, was convicted of Plunder in conspiracy with certain
government officials. He was sentenced by the Sandiganbayan to serve the penalty of reclusion perpetua. Years later, his childhood friend, Benjamin,
was appointed as Secretary of Justice and was able to convince the President to
grant Pido a presidential pardon. Both the judgment of conviction and the
presidential pardon were silent as to accessory penalties. Now a free man, Pido
decided to give back to the community by running for public office as Mayor of
his hometown in Bulacan. The incumbent Mayor sought your advice if he can
challenge the candidacy of Pido. On what
ground/s can the incumbent Mayor challenge the candidacy of Pido? Discuss.
7. Miguel
was charged with Murder for the death of his neighbor, Nikkolas. During trial,
the prosecution established that treachery and evident premeditation attended
the killing of Nikkolas. Hence, the trial court found Miguel guilty as charged
and sentenced him to suffer the penalty of reclusion
perpetua. Upon the lapse of his 30th year in prison, Miguel filed a
petition for a writ of habeas corpus
on the ground that under the three-fold rule, he had served the maximum of his
sentence and that his continued imprisonment is a violation of his right to
liberty. Will the petition of Miguel
prosper? Explain.
8. Samuel,
a Filipino citizen of Chinese descent, assisted the Chinese Government in
surveying and determining the safest and most secure shores in the Philippines.
He thought he was helping the Philippines in this endeavor since the geodetic
maps he prepared would allegedly be transmitted to the Philippines for future
use. Before the survey was completed, Chinese military vessels entered the
Philippines’ Scarborough shores, set up a station secured by two warships, and
populated two islets which the Chinese Government proclaimed as their own, all
with the use of the geodetic maps. Samuel was then charged with Treason by the
Philippine Government. The following testified against Samuel: 1) his helper,
Therese, who saw Samuel in numerous meetings with the Chinese Government,
though she did not understand their conversations since she does not know
Chinese; and 2) his gardener, Rolando, who knows Chinese but has bad eyesight.
Rolando was present in all these meetings and had a glimpse of the finished
geodetic maps signed by Samuel. Is
Samuel liable for Treason? Explain.
9. Macario,
a student activist known for his anti-government views, decided to take
measures into his own hands and carried out the following activities: 1) he
mobilized his barangay and instructed
its members on the finer points of mass uprising; 2) he organized the People’s
Liberation Organization against Poverty (PLOP) and led a march to Malacañan to
air their grievances, chanting subversive words denouncing the lack of action
by the government to alleviate their plight; 3) he divided PLOP into groups of
four members and ordered them to commit theft, raising over a million pesos to
finance their activities; and 4) he posted a threat on his highly popular
social media account that he will bomb several malls in Metro Manila, if the
government will not give in to his demands of providing temporary cash handouts
to the unemployed by the end of the month. The police then arrested Macario and
charged him with violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act. Will the charge prosper? Discuss.
10. Noel,
Omar, and Dennis were all convicted of Illegal Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
and sentenced to seven months in jail. On their third month, a typhoon caused
flood waters to rise up to five feet in the jail facility. Fearing for the
lives of the prisoners in the facility, the Jail Warden released all 30
prisoners, with a directive that they should return when the storm ceases. When
the storm passed, only Noel, Omar, and Dennis turned themselves in, with the
explanation that they would have starved if they did not return. Later, Noel,
Omar, and Dennis were charged with Evasion of Service of Sentence because they
returned not to continue to serve their sentence but for fear of starving. The
Jail Warden was likewise charged with Infidelity in the Custody of Prisoners. Rule on the respective criminal liabilities
of Noel, Omar, and Dennis, and the Jail Warden, if any.
11. Out of their
miserable feeling that they are starving while the wealthy people in Mayaman
Hills subdivision are practically throwing away their food, riding in expensive
cars, and living in extravagance, Primo, Victor, and Maximo marched to said
subdivision and stoned the houses there as an act of hate against the rich. With what crime, if any, should the
apprehending officers charge Primo, Victor, and Maximo? Explain.
12. Timoteo
recently lost his job as a security guard at Kabayan Corporation. He blamed his
termination on his former co-worker, Tales, because the latter was allegedly
badmouthing him at their workplace. One day, Timoteo went back to the company
premises to retrieve his things. When he saw Tales, a heated exchange ensued
between the two. Timoteo then pulled out his gun and shot Tales in the neck.
When the latter dropped to the ground, Timoteo approached him, kneeled on top
of him, and shot him in the head, instantly killing Tales. Timoteo tried to
escape but his other former co-workers caught him. Timoteo was then charged
with Murder, with treachery as a qualifying circumstance. Is Timoteo guilty of Murder? Explain.
13. Rita asked
Belen, a 14-year-old girl, to meet with her at DuoMart Supermarket for an
errand. Upon meeting at the supermarket, however, Rita brought Belen to the
nearby hotel and met Elmer. Rita left the other two in the room, where Elmer
had carnal knowledge of Belen. When Rita returned, Elmer paid her ₱2,200, of
which ₱700 was then given to Belen. Rita warned Belen not to tell anyone about
what happened. Before they could all leave the hotel room, the police barged in
and arrested Elmer and Rita. During the investigation, Rita argued that she did
not force Belen to have sex with Elmer for a fee. Belen herself admitted that
she consented to have sexual intercourse with Elmer. What crime, if any, is Rita liable for? Explain.
14. Jon and
Pilar were in a dating relationship for a year but due to the abusive behavior
of Jon, Pilar broke up with him. Jon pursued Pilar but she refused to reconcile
with him. He then uploaded to his social media account the video of their
sexual congress, as well as the nude pictures of Pilar, all of which he had
recorded on his cellphone without the knowledge of the latter. Distraught,
Pilar filed a complaint with the Office of the Prosecutor and submitted in
evidence the video and pictures that Jon posted on social media. What offense, if any, did Jon commit?
Discuss.
15. Linceo and
Adolfo worked for the same employer who allowed them to reside in a compound in
Pasay City. While Flerida, the 7-year-old daughter of Linceo, was playing with
five other friends on a bulldozer parked near the compound, Adolfo, who was
working nearby, chased the children in anger and told them to climb down the
bulldozer. Except for Flerida, all the other children quickly complied and
left. Eventually, Flerida went down and sat on the nearby pile of coconut
lumber. Adolfo then approached Flerida and poked a welding rod into her genital
area. Flerida cried in pain and saw her vagina bleeding. What crime, if any, should Adolfo be charged with? Explain your answer.
16. Soccoro
owns and leases an apartment building where Rami is one of the tenants under a
two-year lease. The first year went by with no issue as Rami paid his rent on
time, if not earlier. However, when he lost his job after the pandemic, Rami
failed to pay his rent beginning the third month of the second year of the
lease. Soccoro repeatedly demanded payment from him but to no avail. Thus, she
filed a case for ejectment against Rami. When Rami received the summons, he
locked himself in the apartment unit. This infuriated Soccoro so much so that
she padlocked the apartment unit and cut off its utilities when Rami
momentarily left to go to the supermarket. What
crime, if any, did Soccoro commit? Discuss.
17. Police
Colonel Wally had been courting Delia for more than a year. One day, he invited
Delia for some coffee and snacks, which she accepted. Wally arrived in their
agreed meeting place and once there, he escorted Delia inside his car. Instead
of going to a nearby coffee shop, he drove to Lipa City, Batangas, and forcibly
detained Delia in a secluded resort against her will, preventing her from
leaving until she agreed to marry him. Days after, Delia relented and Pastor
Tiburcio solemnized the wedding. Visibly disturbed by the profuse crying of
Delia, Pastor Tiburcio reported the matter to the authorities. What crime, if any, is Wally liable for?
Explain.
18. Metropolitan
Waterworks Sewerage System (MWSS) employee Japar was often assigned to do field
work. Every time he does field work, he accomplishes a disbursement voucher for
the amount that he needs and liquidates the voucher by submitting receipts to the MWSS cashier,
Filomena, at the end of the day. One day, another MWSS employee, Jonas,
desperately needed ₱230,000. Taking the same disbursement voucher that Japar
habitually signs in the morning, Jonas filled it out with the amount that he needed.
He then forged the signature of Japar before presenting it to Filomena, who in
turn released the stated amount. After some time, Filomena noticed that the
voucher remained unliquidated. When Filomena showed the voucher to Japar, the
latter swiftly returned it, telling Filomena that the signature appearing in
the voucher was not his. Filomena then realized that Jonas was the one who
presented the voucher and took the money. When confronted, Jonas readily
admitted to the act. He was eventually convicted of Malversation. Was the conviction of Jonas proper?
Explain.
19. Before
Milet drove to the public market one Sunday, she organized her money by
bundling together her dollars worth US$4,000 and placed ₱20,000 in an envelope.
She drove to the market, bought shrimps and oysters, then hurried back home to
prepare lunch. While she was unloading the food from her car, the bundled
US$4,000 unknowingly fell from her bag and rolled over to the sidewalk. At that
moment, a lato-lato, owned by
13-year-old Henri, suddenly flew near the
car of Milet. When
Henri retrieved his lato-lato, he saw
the bundled money and secretly picked it up. On his way home, Henri bumped into
their gardener, Junie, who saw him carrying the bundled money and grabbed it
from him. After hearing where Henri got the money from, Junie took US$2,000 as
his balato. Junie immediately
exchanged the money to Philippine currency and bought an Omega x Swatch
MoonSwatch, a Gucci belt, and the latest Samsung phone. Junie was later
arrested and charged with Theft. Junie argued that he could not be liable since
he was not the one who found the money. Is
Junie correct? Explain.
20. Dita is a
Councilor of Mati City, Davao Oriental. Her staff, Arabella, alerted her that
she is already delayed in the submission of her 2023 Personal Data Sheet (PDS),
an official document. Dita handed Arabella a copy of the 2022 PDS she
previously filed and asked her to accomplish the 2023 PDS for her, instructing
her to just copy the entries in the 2022 PDS. One of the questions in the PDS
is whether the government official has a pending case before any tribunal.
Arabella answered “No” to the question even if Dita was in fact indicted for
Libel, which was pending before the Regional Trial Court. After Arabella filled
out the PDS, she delivered it to Dita for review, who hastily signed and
submitted it without even checking the veracity of the accomplished entries. What crime, if any, did Dita commit?
Explain.
Comments
Post a Comment